bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview

warning: Creating default object from empty value in /var/www/bleedcrimson.net/modules/taxonomy/taxonomy.pages.inc on line 33.

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 09/14/16

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 09/14/16

bleedCrimson.net: What did your team learn about itself from this past weekend’s matches against Sacramento State, Texas A&M and Arizona?
Mike Jordan: Well, I think we learned some good and some bad. I think the negative is that when we’re struggling, we don’t seem to have emotional leadership right now. I think we get along fine but there’s got to be a stronger voice or two out on that floor demanding the ball, pointing people in the right direction, holding people accountable, etc. The people that did that last year graduated and we’re still struggling to find that in this group. We see it in practices in some instances, not enough. But to do it in a game you’ve got to go outside yourself and be willing to help others. We’ve got to take care of that and pretty quick. We’ve got a couple of people on our team that just need to grow up into that role and take advantage of those opportunities. From that standpoint we’ve got some growing to do. We’ve got a couple of rotations that need work. We’re struggling in two of them in particular that we’ve got to find another way out or two of those rotations. All-in-all, we out pass and and out dig our opponents the vast majority of the time which is great. Since the second weekend we’ve been outserving our opponents fairly consistently and so I like the growth there. We’re figuring out who can do what on the floor and experimenting with some lineups still but we’re getting closer to being a little more settled I think.  Continue Reading This Post >>

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 09/06/16

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 09/06/16

bleedCrimson.net: It was a good weekend for the team going 4-0 in the tournament.
Mike Jordan: It was interesting going there. We were trying to host that weekend as well as this coming weekend and we just couldn’t get enough teams to fill the tournament and so we were looking last minute for a tournament and they were nice enough to accommodate us and it turned out well getting four wins.

bc.net: One of biggest things that stood out from the weekend was net kills for the four teams (kills minus errors), just 28 more kills than errors while you had 132 more kills than errors on the weekend, that’s a pretty wide margin. You ended up holding the four teams to a .068 hitting percentage.
MJ: We were the best team there, this isn’t the strongest tournament we play in but I think the reason we were able to be so successful was our service game was much, much better than the week before. We really worked hard all week at trying to convince our players to go back and serve it faster, hit it harder, make it move more. It’s a hard road to go down because players don’t want to miss serves. It’s in them all the time, they just don’t want to miss. But at this level when you serve it lame and soft just to make, the other team is going to be in system and that makes life a lot more difficult. You have to take chances at the service line. What we’re trying to get them to do is change what they do and you know that getting people outside their comfort zone is a difficult thing. For instance, Bri Ainsworth for years in high school stood in the same spot to serve the ball and high school teams struggle passing, club teams as well. She could go back there and hit her medium speed serve and create some stress and pressure against teams like that but she gets here and she serves balls like that and they’re a soft serve. It’s too easy for this level. And then when she goes back and tries to hit it harder standing in the same spot she misses, she’ll miss long a lot. So she’s reticent and so she goes back to serving it soft. Finally we convinced her and Ariadnne Sierra and a couple others that they had to back up. Back up another ten feet and hit it hard and be consistent in doing it. Don’t change your method just because of the result. We convinced them to do that and they served it better. I still think we missed one or two too many balls that were mishit. If we miss, it’s a foot long but it was well struck, that’s not a big deal. When you hit the side of the ball and create a miss, those are the ones we want to avoid and that’s on the player affecting technique. I just liked our service pressure a lot better and some of the ace numbers were pretty high and that got us off to a good start. We’re getting a lot of medium speed stuff back and you can’t do that with a good team like ours.  Continue Reading This Post >>

Mike Jordan Picks Up Career Win No. 400; Aggies Win Two At Troy Invitational

Written By: NM State Athletic Dept.

TROY, AL - With the 3-0 sweep of Valparaiso (2-2) on Friday, New Mexico State head coach Mike Jordan reached rarified air earning his 400th career win. The Aggies (3-2) captured the win with a 25-9, 25-19, 25-21 decision.

"I have had a lot of great players and a lot of great coaches in my career," said Jordan. "I am proud to be the coach here at New Mexico State. Reflecting back, there have been a lot of big wins, but I think about all of the players too. That's the cool part about this win, it brings me back to my first season here and all of the memories."

In his 19th season at NM State, Jordan now holds a career coaching record of 400-179, all with the Aggies. He is the winningest coach in NM State volleyball history, a title he claimed in 2004.  Continue Reading This Post >>

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 08/30/16

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 08/30/16

bleedCrimson.net: Your thoughts on the opening weekend?
Mike Jordan: We were a couple of points, a couple silly young mistakes from being 2-0 and then getting an opportunity to play UNLV. I was disappointed only in some of the errors that were made, not necessarily that we were making errors. The technique stuff, those types of errors, I’m fine with early in the year especially when you have a young team. The mistakes we made were mental mistakes without aggression. Those were the frustrating ones that I think cost us that match against Santa Barbara. That’s a match I think we win nine out of ten times right now. We just made those critical mistakes late and I think it affected us the next day unfortunately. We didn’t have the same kind of swagger I thought we should and when times got stressful late in games, again we made some silly mistakes. But UNLV has a veteran team loaded with seniors. I think they return every starter from last year. They’re a good team and certainly on their home floor early in the year it’s going to be a tough matchup.

I did see a lot of really good things too. Our kill percentages were good. I think we had pretty good balance. I liked our floor defense quite a bit. We dug a ton of balls. The things that we need to get better at are obviously serving and serving tougher. Late game serving. We need to block it better, we were kind of a mess there. In crunch time we need to be physical and not play not to make mistakes and that unfortunately what happened against Santa Barbara a little bit.  Continue Reading This Post >>

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 08/24/16 :: 2016 Season Preview

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 08/24/16 :: 2016 Season Preview

bleedCrimson.net: The big hole to fill this season is in the middle replacing Gwen Murphy but this is something you’ve had to do before, it seems like about every three or four years you have to replace an all-world player and this is no exception.
Mike Jordan: You try to do it with balance. You don’t want to have to ask someone to do the impossible and carry the same kind of numbers that Gwen had for instance. I think at 23-all it was pretty clear that we were going to try to set Gwen. This year this team is going to be tougher to figure out for opposing teams. We’ve got four arms that are I’m pretty impressed with. I think Sasha [Thomas], Jordan [Abalos], Tatyana [Battle] and Kassie [Tohm] are all high kill percentage type players. We’re just trying to add one or two more in the 6-2 and see what they can do. They’re new players, a lot of them, that are vying for those spots. They’ve got some physical ability and some pretty good competition right now.

bc.net: Kassie Tohm is a player that got some playing time last year and there were some things you wanted to see her get better at. Has she gotten better at those things in the offseason and what do you expect from her this season?
MJ: She has. She played more as a freshman on that team that was really young a couple years ago and then last year with Nash moving to the right and of course having Nathalie Castellanos there, Kassie wound up on the bench, not because she wasn’t capable of putting up numbers but she just wasn’t as well rounded a player as those two were. She’s developed, she’s a better blocker, she handles the ball better, she’s a more functional player which is the word we like to use. She can do multiple things. We’re expecting her to have a good year. I think she’s got the competitiveness and the confidence is growing all the time. We should see a pretty good effort from her on a daily basis.  Continue Reading This Post >>

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 12/18/15 :: Season Wrap Up

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 12/18/15

bleedCrimson.net: Now that you’ve had some time to decompress and take a look back at the season, what are you overall feelings about the season?
Mike Jordan: First off I think it was one of our better years. Certainly the best one since ’08. I think the thing that stands out the most for me was that this was just a fun team to coach. This is a hard working team with really solid leadership at the top. Just a lot of great people and it was just one of those teams that you wish you could have a group like this every year.

bc.net: As far as the team and the season and reaching the potential that you felt your team could reach this year in terms of things that you could control, how do you feel like the team did with respect to that?
MJ: I feel really good about it. This team was exceptional offensively. We had great balance. I doubt you’ll find a more balanced offensive team in the country. We had a superstar attacker in Gwen Murphy and tremendous balance around her offensively. Defensively we worked hard digging and keeping the ball off the floor. We were not a good blocking team. I think that was the one weakness this team had. It was exposed against the big physical teams like Stanford in the NCAA Tournament. We just had trouble getting stops, especially late in games against programs and teams like Stanford. That was more of a size issue than anything else. It wasn’t that we didn’t work hard at it or give it a good effort, we were just limited in size in a couple of spots. I think this team did a very good job of trying to get to their potential.  Continue Reading This Post >>

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 11/30/15

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 11/30/15

bleedCrimson.net: The team found out their destination and opponent on Sunday, give me your initial thoughts on facing No. 8 Stanford?
Mike Jordan: Well, the first thing that I think that needs to be said is that I’m not happy, and it’s not just me, it’s many of the coaches in our sport who are not happy with the way that they select and seed and place teams in the tournament. When you look at what we’ve done this year, you can easily make a case that we’re every bit as good as Colorado State. Our results against common opponents are actually a little bit better and the same with Loyola Marymount, both very, very good teams. But we wind up playing Stanford in the first round because of our RPI number and because of geographically based selection choices. If you seeded this team 1 to 64 and you got rid of the RPI which was never meant to rank teams, it was only meant to group them. It’s been proven to be faulty and it’s easily manipulated by many conferences, ours is not one of them unfortunately. If you threw out the RPI you could easily make the case that we’re somewhere in the middle of the pack in this tournament. Yet, we wind up playing the 8th seeded team. That’s frustrating. All the work that we’ve done over the course of the season should be rewarded and yet in a couple of brackets you’ve got a couple of teams that barely got in who are playing each other with a chance to win an NCAA Tournament game and that frustrates me. That aside, the opportunity to play Stanford at Stanford is a great opportunity and it’s an opportunity to showcase ourselves a little bit. They’re a great team. It’ll be a great environment and those things in and of itself are a reward and I know the players are happy about the opportunity.

bc.net: Going back to the RPI and the selection process, obviously coaches know the RPI is weighted a lot heavier that what you’d like and you in particular have done what you can from a scheduling standpoint to counteract that. This is to specifically address people who might think that your low RPI number is based on you playing a weak schedule, you look at your schedule this year and you played against seven teams that are in this year’s field. You’ve done what you can.
MJ: That’s the frustrating part. This flawed system is weighted so heavily to conferences that have the ability to manipulate the RPI. Our conference, even before Hawai’i and everybody left, our conference often times hurt us. I’ve talked about this before but in 2006 at the end of the non-conference season our RPI was 16th because of what we’d done and we went 15-1 and split with Hawai’i and our RPI fell all the way down to 33. We still got in because it’s still a good RPI but we went 15-1 and split with Hawai’i and dropped almost 20 spots. It’s frustrating because once non-conference play is over we really don’t have the opportunity to improve ourselves (in RPI), we can only go down, even if we win a ton. If you have one bad night against the 120th team in the RPI like Bakersfield or Seattle who are decent teams, you drop even more. It’s a no-win situation for us right now and it’s very frustrating. But you’re right, we did everything we could. We can’t control a large portion of our schedule and that’s just the way it is.  Continue Reading This Post >>

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 11/24/15

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 11/24/15

bleedCrimson.net: With the kind of season that you’ve had, running the table in the regular season but going into the tournament knowing that you would likely need to win the tournament to get into the NCAA tournament, how do you feel like your team handled that? They looked like they were as focused as they’ve been all season.
Mike Jordan: Yeah, unfortunately with RPI being such an important part of the selection criteria even though it shouldn’t be, it should be tossed out completely. Our players are very aware the fact that our RPI now stands at 64 which puts us outside of the bubble if they go exclusively by RPI or if the majority of the choices are made by RPI. The committee says that they’re not but it obviously is. I think they understood that and it adds pressure but a senior laden group that we have should be able to handle a little bit of pressure and they did and I’m proud of them.

bc.net: Andrea Tauai had a big match in the championship match against Bakersfield and was a big key as to why you were able to win that match.
MJ: She played even better against UMKC and has been playing very well the last half of the season. She’s a really competitive kid and coming in as a transfer from the junior college ranks a year ago, it takes a year to acclimate for sure. Last year was hard for her to go from the junior college level to the Division I level but she’s really made a lot of progress and she understands what we’re doing a little bit better and she’s a much more skilled player than what she was when she got her. All of that is starting to pay off. You add that to her competitiveness and you’ve got yourself a really good player.  Continue Reading This Post >>

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 11/17/15

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 11/17/15

bleedCrimson.net: Your thoughts on the two conference wins last week, a hard fought victory over Seattle in five sets and a relatively quick win against Utah Valley.
Mike Jordan: Both teams have a lot of good players and they’re solid teams. We felt like playing on the road was going to be difficult, especially back-to-back weeks of traveling. But I think the Seattle match, they’ve got the length and the serving ability to give us problems and they were doing that for a while. We were in control early in sets and then we’d have passing breakdowns and get a little high error and they took over and were in control. We were struggling to put point runs together basically because we weren’t handling the ball well enough. We finally made a decision to go to a three person serve receive in set four and it paid off. It settled us down. We were just able to control the match from there.

bc.net: Did you play Jordan Abalos as your libero in set four?
MJ: Jordan played libero for one of the sets but then we switched her to left back in set four. We followed that up at Utah Valley with Andi Tauai and Jordan Abalos on the left and were able to pass real well against Utah Valley and that’s the key for us. I think in system we’re the best team in the conference but out of system, it’s a little bit of a crapshoot and we’ve got to make sure that when we’re out of system that we’re low error and that hasn’t always been the case, especially at Seattle. Against Utah Valley we did a better job of making good decisions when we were out of system and I think we were in control most of the way.  Continue Reading This Post >>

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 11/10/15

bleedCrimson.net Weekly Coach Jordan Interview :: 11/10/15

bleedCrimson.net: Congratulations on winning the WAC regular season championship. I’m sure it was one of the team’s goals entering the season. What are your thoughts on this team being able to accomplish that goal?
Mike Jordan: We felt like certainly if we were healthy that we would be the favorite. UMKC obviously was picked to win in the preseason but I think last year with the difficult year because we had so many injuries and we were young, I felt like we had the most talent. We just needed to stay healthy and improve the offseason. I felt like this was possible, what we’ve done. Players have to go out and do it. You’ve got to work hard to get those goals and fortunately they did and they’ve earned what they’ve done so far.

bc.net: What are your thoughts on the two matches last week against Bakersfield and Grand Canyon and your team’s play?
MJ: We were solid. We’ve been pretty good offensively most of the year. We were a little high error in the first match on Thursday but did some other things pretty well. I thought our defense was solid and we served the ball pretty well. Saturday we were very good offensively in stretches. The one set we dropped we were really bad defensively. In fact I told the team we played two types of defense in that set, bad defense and no defense. We just had to get it together and get after it defensively again. We did that in the third set and it obviously changed how we attacked the ball too. We hit for a big percentage and we did fine. Obviously in November you’d like to see some but at this point of the season you just take them as they come.  Continue Reading This Post >>